There is an interop list which does not have IPR requirement. The IPR Contribution Agreement is there to prevent a party to embed patent encumbered claims into the specification to collect license fees at a later date. There is no need for such in just working with the interops.
OpenID Connect Interop Group: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/openid-connect-interop Cheers, Nat On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:37 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Justin Richer > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 9:35 AM > > To: oauth@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identity Provider Interop Testing? > > > > You're better off contacting the OpenID Connect working group and the > > interoperability list there. > > > > http://openid.net/wg/connect/ > > > > While there's a lot of overlap in the communities, OAuth and OIDC are > > different protocols and the discussion you want is better held there. > > Understood, but there's this little detail: > > > Please note that while anyone can join the mailing list as a read-only > > recipient, posting to the mailing list or actively contributing to the > > specification itself requires the submission of an IPR Agreement. > > Sorry for the off-topic post, but I thought that a note sent to this list > might just find the right people without having to deal with the overhead > of getting an IPR Agreement in place to gain posting privileges. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- Nat Sakimura Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
