Hi Mike,

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017, at 03:05 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> I'd be OK limiting the protocol elements to using ASCII characters, if
> that would be the IESG's preference.

I think that would be much simpler for everybody.

I still want to confirm that spaces are allowed in names. Can you
confirm?

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 12:06 AM
> To: The IESG <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Hannes Tschofenig
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05:
> (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
> 
> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values-05: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-amr-values/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a fine document and I support its publication. However I have a
> small set of issues that I would like to discuss first.
> 
> Are non ASCII names needed? (This is a protocol element, not a human
> readable string, so non ASCII is not needed). Are ASCII spaces allowed in
> names? More generally: what do you call printable character?
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In Section 6.1: suggestion to first describe IANA registration policy,
> then describe restrictions on registered names. Otherwise the current
> text doesn't flow well.
> 
> I am also agreeing with Stephen's DISCUSS.
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to