Many thanks for your review, Joel. I have balloted no-objection for this document on today’s IESG telechat.
Jari On 03 Feb 2017, at 01:03, Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Not Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-?? > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2017-02-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-13 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16 > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed > Standard > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: > Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described > as > "non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by > definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to > reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the > "non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to > be examples. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > gen-...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth