Hi Justin, John, and Hannes

Is there an appetite to change the draft in such a way as: 

- do not wrap access token itself. It could include at_hash though. 
  Rationale: Pop access token can be pretty large and I do not want to
double base64url encode. 
- perhaps change ts to string to accommodate nonce like string. 

Essentially, what I want to do is not the http signing but just the pop
based 
client authentication, which is very simple. 
While I was writing it up, it occurred that if the above modification were
done, your draft will be a superset of what I wanted to do. 

My write up is here: http://bit.ly/oauth-jpop

Financial API uses cases needs something like that. 
(Another possibility is a sender confirmation.) 

Best, 

Nat Sakimura

--
PLEASE READ :This e-mail is confidential and intended for the
named recipient only. If you are not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender  and delete this e-mail.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 1:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:
draft-ietf-oauth-signed-http-request-03.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : A Method for Signing HTTP Requests for OAuth
>         Authors         : Justin Richer
>                           John Bradley
>                           Hannes Tschofenig
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-oauth-signed-http-request-03.txt
>       Pages           : 13
>       Date            : 2016-08-08
> 
> Abstract:
>    This document a method for offering data origin authentication and
>    integrity protection of HTTP requests.  To convey the relevant data
>    items in the request a JSON-based encapsulation is used and the JSON
>    Web Signature (JWS) technique is re-used.  JWS offers integrity
>    protection using symmetric as well as asymmetric cryptography.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-signed-http-request/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-signed-http-request-03
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-signed-http-request-03
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to