All, Please note that this errata report has been removed. As stated at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php:
"Errata are for the RFCs as available from rfc-editor.org. We have sent separate mail regarding this error to [email protected]. Thank you. RFC Editor/mf On Oct 6, 2017, at 9:09 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252, > "OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5148 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Brian Vosburgh <[email protected]> > > Section: 8.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Section 1 of PKCE [RFC7636] details how this limitation can be > used to execute a code interception attack. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > > > Notes > ----- > The embedded link for the text "Section 1" points at Section 1 of *this* RFC > (i.e. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8252#section-1); but it should point at > Section 1 of *RFC7636* (i.e. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7636#section-1). > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8252 (draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps > Publication Date : October 2017 > Author(s) : W. Denniss, J. Bradley > Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
