Nat,

During the interim meeting, 3 drafts mentioned in the context of *Distributed
OAuth*:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-meta-08
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators-02
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tschofenig-oauth-audience-00


*Brian, Hannes,*

Are you planning on presenting your documents?

Regards,
 Rifaat






On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be interested in hearing that.
>
> Also, as part of "Distributed OAuth", can we do a bit of re-cap on some of
> the previous drafts on the similar topic as we discussed in the interim?
> i.e., Brian's draft (where is the link now?) and my draft (
> draft-sakimura-oauth-meta
> <https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sakimura-oauth-meta-08.txt>)?
>
> Best,
>
> Nat
>
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:30 AM William Denniss <wdenn...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hannes & Rifaat,
>>
>> I would like the opportunity to present on OAuth 2.0 Incremental
>> Authorization (draft-wdenniss-oauth-incremental-auth) [an update for
>> which will be posted today] and "OAuth 2.0 Device Posture Signals"
>> (draft-wdenniss-oauth-device-posture).
>>
>> I can also give an update on the status of Device Flow
>> (draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow). I expect that to be short now that WGLC
>> has concluded and the document has advanced.
>>
>> Little late to this thread and I see we already have 2 sessions in the
>> draft agenda, but I'd like to add my support to keeping both sessions,
>> there's always a lot to discuss and in the past we've been able to use any
>> spare time to discuss the security topics of the day.
>>
>> Regards,
>> William
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 4:40 AM Hannes Tschofenig <
>> hannes.tschofe...@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is time already to think about the agenda for the next IETF meeting.
>>> Rifaat and I were wondering whether we need one or two sessions. We would
>>> like to make the decision based on the topics we will discuss. Below you
>>> can find a first version of the agenda with a few remarks. Let us know if
>>> you have comments or suggestions for additional agenda items.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes & Rifaat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OAuth Agenda
>>>
>>> ------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Welcome and Status Update  (Chairs)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   * OAuth Security Workshop Report
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   * Documents in IESG processing
>>>
>>>      # draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-07
>>>
>>>      # draft-ietf-oauth-discovery-08
>>>
>>>      # draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-15
>>>
>>>      # draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-11
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        Remark: Status updates only if needed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -  JSON Web Token Best Current Practices
>>>
>>>    # draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-00
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Remark: We are lacking reviews on this document.
>>>
>>>    Most likely we will not get them during the f2f meeting
>>>
>>>    but rather by reaching out to individuals ahead of time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -  OAuth 2.0 Mutual TLS Client Authentication and Certificate Bound
>>> Access Tokens
>>>
>>>    # draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-06
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    Remark: Could be completed by the time of the IETF meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - OAuth Security Topics
>>>
>>>   # draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-04
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Remark: We could do a consensus call on parts of the document soon.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - OAuth 2.0 Token Binding
>>>
>>>   # draft-ietf-oauth-token-binding-05
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Remark: Document is moving along but we are lacking implementations.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - OAuth 2.0 Device Posture Signals
>>>
>>>   # draft-wdenniss-oauth-device-posture-01
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Remark: Interest in the work but we are lacking content (maybe even
>>>
>>>   expertise in the group)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Reciprocal OAuth
>>>
>>>   # draft-hardt-oauth-mutual-02
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Remark: We had a virtual interim meeting on this topic and there is
>>>
>>>   interest in this work and apparently no competing solutions. The plan
>>>
>>>   is to run a call for adoption once we are allowed to add a new
>>> milestone
>>>
>>>   to our charter.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Distributed OAuth
>>>
>>>   # draft-hardt-oauth-distributed-00
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   Remark: We had a virtual interim meeting on this topic and there is
>>>
>>>   interest in this work. Further work on the scope is needed.
>>> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
>>> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
>>> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the
>>> information in any medium. Thank you.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>
> --
>
> Nat Sakimura
>
> Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to