I don’t know the relative merits of Link headers vs .well-known, but there is at least one other draft standard I know of that is going down the .well-known route for this kind of thing (password changes in this case):
https://github.com/WICG/change-password-url/blob/gh-pages/explainer.md — Neil > On 3 May 2019, at 04:41, Evert Pot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > I've been running into a number of situations where it would have been > beneficial to have a few protocol/media-type agnositic link relation > types for user authentication purposes. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pot-authentication-link > > Nothing here is coupled to OAuth, but the link relations could > potentially be used with OAuth2 servers. > > I don't exactly know the IETF process, but I thought it would be a good > idea to ask for feedback here. My understanding is that either I should > find an appropriate WG that's willing to adopt it, or I could do an > individual submission. I'm not entirely sure yet which would be the most > appropriate WG to ask, so I thought I'd start here. > > Evert > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
