Indeed but at the same time, it may be needed for the AS to keep it
anyways for compliance purposes.

I have not gone through the thread yet, but here is my brief response
to Torsten's post.

https://nat.sakimura.org/2019/05/12/comments-back-to-transaction-authorization-or-why-we-need-to-re-think-oauth-scopes-by-torsten/

Cheers,

Nat Sakimura

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:27 PM George Fletcher
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> One thing to keep in mind with the "Push Request Object" model and the 
> concept of a more detailed scope structure, if the specified values are not 
> for a single transaction, then the AS will be required to keep the "Pushed 
> Request Object" for the "lifetime" of the access_token and possibly the 
> refresh_token depending on the use case. This could have some implementation 
> issues for the AS.
>
> Thanks,
> George
>
> On 5/10/19 9:52 AM, Dave Tonge wrote:
>
> Thanks Torsten for this article - it is incredibly helpful.
>
> I'm very much in favour of the "structured_scope" approach.
>
> While I understand George's point I think the line is very blurred between 
> coarse-grained scopes and fine-grained transaction consent. In addition 
> fine-grained authorisation metadata is needed for ongoing access APIs as 
> well, e.g. how can a client ask for ongoing access to:
>  - transactions in a users accounts with ids abc123 and abc124
>
> From a UX perspective it is beneficial for the AS to ask the user for consent 
> once. The AS therefore needs to have all the information about relating to 
> the consent available when the user is redirected to the authorization 
> endpoint. There should be a standard way for the Client to pass this data to 
> the AS and I think structured scopes either sent as a query param or in a 
> request object are a neat way of doing this.
>
> Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to