Thanks again Adam for the review, suggestions, and grammar lesson. I went ahead and pushed a -17, which I think addresses everything discussed herein.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-17 On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:02 PM Adam Roach <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/22/19 5:48 PM, Brian Campbell wrote: > > Regarding the comment on tls_client_auth_san_ip, some other reviewers > > have suggested using the using the IPv6 Address Text Representation > > described in RFC 5952 rather than the one from in RFC 4291. Which I > > think makes sense to do. Maybe also with a note that the comparison of > > the addresses should done using binary as suggested in > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952#section-8 > > > > What do you think? > > > That sounds like a fine approach. Thanks for digging that reference up. :) > > /a > > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
