Thanks again for the suggestion Suresh. The switch to use RFC5952 is now in the document https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-17
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:51 PM Brian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Suresh, I'll consider using RFC5952 there as I try and work though > some other comments on that parameter in that section. > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:16 PM Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> * Section 2.1.2. >> >> Suggest using the IPv6 Address Text Representation described in RFC5952 >> instead >> of using the representations described in RFC4291 section 2.2. The >> canonical >> representation described in RFC5952 makes it easier to compare two IPv6 >> address >> strings which is probably something you want to do while doing mutual >> authentication. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
