> On 23. Sep 2019, at 20:22, Brian Campbell 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> That should probably be fixed unless the example was intended to be set 
> nearly 48,000 years* in the future.
> 
> 
> * assuming my math is correct and you know the old saying about assuming 

Haha. You both seem to have a bias towards examples, right? :-)

I fixed the bug, but will be waiting for more feedback before I publish the 
next revision.  

Thanks!

> 
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 8:55 AM Neil Madden <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just noticed that the iat/exp claims in the example JWT response in section 5 
> appear to be in milliseconds rather than the standard seconds. 
> 
> — Neil
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
> distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited..  If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. 
> Thank you._______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to