This will have no impact on the adoption of the DPoP document. Regards, Rifaat
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:22 AM Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten= [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > assuming WG adoption of DPoP does not depend on the virtual interim, I’m > fine with the proposal. > > best regards, > Torsten. > > > On 26. Mar 2020, at 21:03, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Rifaat and I had a chat about the virtual interim meetings. > > We decided to schedule 6 one-hour-long sessions with 2 topics per > session. > > > > Here is the list of topics we want to discuss: > > > > 1) OAuth Security Topics + Browser-Based Apps > > > > 2) JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens + Nested JWT > > > > 3) PAR + RAR > > > > 4) OAuth 2.1 + JWT Response for OAuth Token Introspection > > > > 5) DPoP + OAuth 2.0 Incremental Authorization > > > > 6) Client Intermediary Metadata + Reciprocal OAuth > > > > We were thinking about using our Monday, 12:00 EDT, office hour timeslot. > > Proposed starting date is April 6th. > > > > Would this be acceptable? > > > > Ciao > > Hannes & Rifaat > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
