Good point. Thanks, Brian.

We should retrofit typs everywhere..in hindsight.

———
Dominick Baier

On 22. July 2020 at 23:55:20, Brian Campbell (bcampb...@pingidentity.com)
wrote:

Because it wouldn't actually prevent it in this case due to JWT assertion
client authentication (a.k.a. private_key_jwt) having come about well
before the JWT BCP and the established concept of using the 'typ' header to
prevent cross-JWT confusion. Thus there's no validation rule regarding the
'typ' header defined in RFC 7523 for JWT client authentication. Explicitly
typing the request object JWT doesn't do anything to prevent it from being
used in the context of previously existing JWT applications like client
auth.

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:32 AM Dominick Baier <dba...@leastprivilege.com>
wrote:

> Why not use a typ header as suggested by the JWT BCP?
>
> ———
> Dominick Baier
>
> On 22. July 2020 at 17:37:41, Brian Campbell (
> bcampbell=40pingidentity....@dmarc.ietf.org) wrote:
>
> The TL;DR here is a somewhat tentative suggestion that a brief security
> consideration be added to
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/
> <https://datatracker..ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/> that
> prohibits the inclusion of a 'sub' claim containing the client id value in
> the request object JWT so as to prevent the request object JWT (which is
> exposed to the user agent) from being erroneously accepted as a valid JWT
> for client authentication.
>
> Some more details and the discussion that led to this here email can be
> found at https://github.com/oauthstuff/draft-oauth-par/issues/41
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
> prohibited...  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file
> attachments from your computer. Thank 
> you.*_______________________________________________
>
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
*CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your
computer. Thank you.*
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to