Greetings,

FYI we have deleted this report as a duplicate (per the verifier note below).

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs

> On May 31, 2020, at 3:39 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7800,
> "Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web Tokens (JWTs)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6195
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Rejected
> Type: Editorial
> 
> Reported by: Eric ramos <[email protected]>
> Date Reported: 2020-05-31
> Rejected by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)
> 
> Section: 7157
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> [JWK]      Jones, M., "JSON Web Key (JWK)", RFC 7517,
>              DOI 10.17487/RFC7517, May 2015,
>              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7517>.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
>   Seems to be a (malformed?) duplicate of eid 6187
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7800 (draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JSON Web Tokens 
> (JWTs)
> Publication Date    : April 2016
> Author(s)           : M. Jones, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to