Hi! A correction ...
> -----Original Message----- > From: Roman Danyliw > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:11 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Status summary of document in AD Evaluation status > > Hi! > > Below is a summary explanation of where all of the documents that are with > me (as AD) stand. I hope this better explains the status in the datatracker. > > ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt > Status: AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed (aka, after WG LC but before IETF LC > pending edits the AD has requested) > > Pending edits from AD review confirmed at > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/t57XP7RICTpoI3FbOyrY0gpsNnE/. > After these are merged, this document can proceed to IESG Review. These edits have been merged and the document is now in IETC LC. > ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq > Status: Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead:Revised I-D Needed (aka, after the > second WG and IETF LC, but IETF LC Directorate reviews require action) > > All AD review and individual IETF LC feedback was addressed. > > A few outstanding updates remain from the IETF LC SECDIR review -- > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/5CrZTLR8v6cm8wZVkfY_Yywckcw/ > . > > After these changes are made, this document can return for IESG Review. > > ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response > Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead:Revised I-D Needed (aka, after the second WG > and IETF LC, but IESG DISCUSS position from first IESG requires actions) [snip] I made a mistake when reviewing the old ballot position against the document -- I must have used an older version. This document was ready and has been placed on the Feb 6, 2021 telechat. Thanks to Torsten for double checking. Roman _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
