Vladimir Dzhuvinov
On 28/06/2021 17:14, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I still believe that using non 2119 language (i.e., "must" rather than "MUST") would be better for the privacy section, but won't block the document on this minor point.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
