Unfortunately I don’t know what the approval process is — I don’t feel I need to discuss or review with the others — the IANA registration is pretty straightforward and I have not heard any controversy about it
I recall at least 2 of the other experts are aligned on the underlying spec. On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:46 PM Amanda Baber via RT < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dick, > > Should we wait for further approvals or proceed with the registration? The > document has been approved by the IESG, so we can move ahead now once one > or more experts instruct us to do so. > > thanks, > Amanda > > On Wed Jan 05 16:14:21 2022, [email protected] wrote: > > I'm fine with the IANA registry update. > > ᐧ > > > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 7:19 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Mike, Nat, John, Dick, > > > > > > Can you please take a look at this to allow us to make progress with > this > > > document? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Rifaat > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:57 PM Amanda Baber via RT < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata > > >> registry experts) > > >> > > >> Have you had a chance to review the request in this document? > > >> > > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > >> > > >> Is approval from all four experts required? > > >> > > >> thanks, > > >> > > >> Amanda Baber > > >> IANA Operations Manager > > >> > > >> On Wed Nov 24 21:27:25 2021, amanda.baber wrote: > > >> > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server > Metadata > > >> > registry experts) > > >> > > > >> > I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the > > >> > next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2? > > >> > > > >> > Please let us know if approval from all four experts is required. > > >> > > > >> > thanks, > > >> > > > >> > Amanda Baber > > >> > IANA Operations Manager > > >> > > > >> > On Tue Nov 16 21:09:23 2021, michelle.cotton wrote: > > >> > > Mailing List/Expert Review requested > > >> > > > > >> > > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server > > >> > > Metadata > > >> > > registry experts) > > >> > > > > >> > > As the designated experts for the OAuth Authorization Server > Metadata > > >> > > registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-oauth- > > >> > > iss- > > >> > > auth-resp for us? Please see: > > >> > > > > >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/ > > >> > > > > >> > > A single, new registration is being requested: > > >> > > > > >> > > Metadata Name: authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported > > >> > > Metadata Description: Boolean value indicating whether the > > >> > > authorization server provides the iss parameter in the > authorization > > >> > > response. > > >> > > Change Controller: IESG > > >> > > Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 3 ] > > >> > > > > >> > > If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the document for > > >> > > publication, we'll make the registration at > > >> > > > > >> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/ > > >> > > > > >> > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know > > >> > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before > we > > >> > > mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the > authors, if > > >> > > the registrations aren't OK). > > >> > > > > >> > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration > > >> > > reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30. > > >> > > > > >> > > Thank you, > > >> > > > > >> > > Michelle Cotton > > >> > > IANA Services > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> oauth-ext-review mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review > > >> > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
