Yes, the link to -00 was by mistake. This second WGLC is for -01 version. Regards, Rifaat
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022, Neil Madden <[email protected]> wrote: > I also support publication of the new draft (the 01 revision, not the 00 > revision linked to in this WGLC! I assume that’s just a mistake). > > — Neil > > On 23 Feb 2022, at 08:59, Vladimir Dzhuvinov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 in support for publication. > > The Nimbus JWT lib was recently updated to match the 01 spec with the hash > alg in the URN. > > Vladimir Dzhuvinov > > On 21/02/2022 15:12, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > All, > > Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great > comments received during the initial WGLC. > > This is a *second* WG Last Call for this document to make sure that the > WG has a chance to review these changes: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk- > thumbprint-uri-00.html > > Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *March 7th*. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing [email protected]https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
