Dear All, 1. At the outset I must compliment Daniel Fett and Kristina Yasudafor and all the contributors for the wonderful work done on SD-JWT. 2. However, in my opinion there is no clear motivation for using SD-JWT in the present oAuth 2.0/2.1 ecosystem. We already have JWS and JWE which more or less satisfy the requirements. 3. The focus and time of the WG-OAUTH should be more aligned to the work directly impacting the improvements or BCP in the oAuth 2.0/2.1 specs. 4. WG-JWP (JSON Web Proofs) may be a more suitable place for the adoption of SD-JWT as they are working on a similar set of problems. They are actively seeking participation in the area of SD-JWT. 5. In view of above I am presently not in favour of its adoption in WG-OAUTH.
Regards Jaimandeep Singh On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 6:43 AM Brian Campbell <bcampbell= 40pingidentity....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I support adoption. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022, 8:17 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is a call for adoption for the *SD-JWT* document >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fett-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/ >> >> Please, provide your feedback on the mailing list by *August 12th*. >> >> Regards, >> Rifaat & Hannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and > privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any > review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from > your computer. Thank you.*_______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
