Greetings,
FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Jul 21, 2023, at 7:32 PM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, > "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7569 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: BRUNO LEITE DA SILVA <[email protected]> > > Section: 6749 > > Original Text > ------------- > BANCO.COM > > Corrected Text > -------------- > BANCO.COM/ > > Notes > ----- > /ALLISSUR > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework > Publication Date : October 2012 > Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
