On Wed, Aug 23, 2023, 3:35 AM Daniel Fett <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Watson,
>
> can you please be specific about the "standard, 22 year old security 
> definitions" and "schemes of this type"?
>
> Not having to make assumptions would certainly help to have a useful 
> discussion.

Unlinkability as defined in CL01
(https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-44987-6_7) . The
security considerations section of the draft does explicitly admit
this shortcoming.
>
> -Daniel
>

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to