There is a lot of description about the process in the IETF, see 
https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informal/

 

Relevant to this discussion is RFC 7221: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7221/

It is a document everyone in the group should be familiar with.

 

Ciao

Hannes

 

 

From: OAuth <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dmitry Telegin
Sent: Mittwoch, 15. November 2023 23:10
To: Pieter Kasselman <[email protected]>
Cc: oauth <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Transaction Tokens

 

Not sure if I have formal right to vote, will just state that we are currently 
using something very similar internally, and will be looking forward to 
adopting a standards-based approach.

 

BTW is there an issue tracker for this one? couldn't find links to GH etc.

 

Thanks,

Dmitry

Backbase / Keycloak

 

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 4:40 PM Pieter Kasselman 
<[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

I support adoption.

 

From: OAuth <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf 
Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 12:58 PM
To: oauth <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Transaction Tokens

 

All,

This is an official call for adoption for the Transaction Tokens draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tulshibagwale-oauth-transaction-tokens/

Please, reply on the mailing list and let us know if you are in favor or 
against adopting this draft as WG document, by Nov 28th.

Regards,
 Rifaat & Hannes

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to