But the AS is already governing the access between clients, so at the
surface at least I'm not able to wrap my head around your counterargument.

Also this:

> Also, the resource owner client cannot easily revoke tokens issued to
> third party clients that it federates access with.


Why not? It is just as easy to revoke a token issued to third party clients
as it is to do in any OAuth compatible RS. What makes this case special
for you, that the "Resource Owner" (your service client) in this case would
not be able to revoke the tokens issued to the "Client" (the Third party
application).

Isn't this all doable with OAuth in spec without any magic?

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 10:28 AM Igor Janicijevic <i...@ivagor.com> wrote:

> Yes, technically you can use token exchange to federate access but you
> have to manage AS policy for each combination of clients that need to
> exchange tokens. Also, the resource owner client cannot easily revoke
> tokens issued to third party clients that it federates access with.
>
> This draft tries to address those issues by giving resource owner client
> ability to delegate as much or as little access as they need to as well as
> the ability to revoke that delegation at any point in time. This also means
> that AS does not need to maintain policy that governs the federation (or
> delegation) of access between the clients.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Warren Parad [mailto:wpa...@rhosys.ch]
> *Sent:* Sunday, 19 May 2024 1:36 AM
> *To:* Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Igor Janicijevic <i...@ivagor.com>; <oauth@ietf.org> <oauth@ietf.org
> >
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Re: New Internet Draft: OAuth 2.0 Delegated B2B
> Authorization
>
>
>
> That was my first thought, but since we only have one AS, isn't just this
> just OAuth but switching up which is the RS and which is the user agent?
>
>
>
> Why wouldn't the third party just request a client_credentials grant for
> the RS using the appropriate audience?
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2024, 16:52 Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't that covered by Token Exchange already?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8693
>
>
>
> Le sam. 18 mai 2024, 16:29, Igor Janicijevic <i...@ivagor.com> a écrit :
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have published an Internet Draft document that I would like to introduce
> to the OAuth working group for consideration. Here is the link for your
> reference:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-janicijevic-oauth-b2b-authorization-00.html
>
>
>
> Abstract
>
> Delegated B2B Authorization enables a third-party OAuth client to obtain a
> limited access to an HTTP service on behalf of another OAuth client which
> is acting as a resource owner. This specification extends the OAuth 2.0
> Authorization Framework with two new endpoints which allow a resource owner
> OAuth client to manage access for a third-party OAuth client.
>
>
>
> Motivation
>
> I work for a large financial services organization, and we are using OAuth
> 2.0 extensively to secure API based B2B integrations with various third
> parties by utilizing OAuth client_credentials grant type. Some of those
> third parties are our customers, while others are either our partners or
> partners of our customers. One of the challenges that we have encountered
> is that there is no standard way to delegate access to resources in B2B
> integrations, so that one party can obtain access to protected resources on
> behalf of another party. The above internet draft describes a possible
> extension to OAuth 2.0 that may be able to address this issue.
>
>
>
> I am looking forward to receiving your feedback.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to