Hi all, I’m sending this message on behalf of ISO/IEC JTC1 SC17 WG10:
WG10 would like to express their support for allowing the OID to be utilized for other entries within the status mechanism registry. WG10 is currently working on the second revision of ISO/IEC 18013-5, which will include support for the status mechanism. This revision will support two mechanisms: the Status List mechanism, as defined in the Token Status List specification, and a very similar mechanism called the “Identifier List” mechanism. The Identifier List mechanism is based on the Token List specification, with the exception that it contains a list of revoked identifiers. However, it otherwise uses the exact same structures. To ensure that the Token Status List specification is as close as possible to the Token List specification and to be compliant with a potential future IETF standard that would standardize the Identifier List mechanism, WG10 has collaborated with the editors of the Token Status List specification. Therefore, it would be ideal if the same OID could be used for both the status list and identifier list implementations, rather than specifying an OID for the identifier list within the ISO specification. Additionally, WG10 intends to modify the definition in a future revision of ISO/IEC 18013-5 to refer to an IETF specification if the IETF has specified the identifier list mechanism in the future in a way that’s compliant with the current mechanism in ISO/IEC 18013-5. It would be unfortunate if the need to specify an OID within the ISO/IEC 18013-5 specification would make this process more challenging. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
