Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- WGLC (1 of ?): trust relationship reliazation (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining/issues/169
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+32/-0/💬4)
32 issues created:
- WGLC Editorial comments from Dan Moore (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/236 [WGLC Feedback]
- Empty Type Parameter (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/235 [WGLC Feedback]
- TTS Configuration (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/234 [WGLC Feedback]
- Logical vs Physical TTS (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/233 [WGLC Feedback]
- Need consistent normative language for txn claim (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/232 [WGLC Feedback]
- Describe parameter use (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/231 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify "JWT Representation" (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/230 [WGLC Feedback]
- Consider "Authorization surface" (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/229 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify claim usage (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/228 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify Normative Language (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/227 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify "determining" (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/226 [WGLC Feedback]
- Define subject of transaction token (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/225 [WGLC Feedback]
- Consistency with Section 2.2.1 (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/224
- Clarify Example (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/223 [WGLC Feedback]
- Should tctx field be a MUST (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/222 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify difference between sub and req_wl (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/221 [WGLC Feedback]
- Clarify aud claim (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/220 [WGLC Feedback]
- WGLC Editorial Feedback from Joe Saloway (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/219 [WGLC Feedback]
- Reference WIMSE WIT (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/218 [WGLC Feedback]
- Transaction token Lifetime extension (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/217 [WGLC Feedback]
- txn-ctx modification (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/216 [WGLC Feedback]
- Request context validation (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/215 [WGLC Feedback]
- Self signed JWT Validation (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/214 [WGLC Feedback]
- Compare WIMSE arch doc terminology with Transaction token spec (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/213 [WGLC Feedback]
- Create internally initiated example (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/212 [WGLC Feedback]
- Extend life of transaction tokens (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/211 [WGLC Feedback]
- Revise Normative Langugage (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/210 [WGLC Feedback]
- Consider stronger normative language (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/209 [WGLC Feedback]
- Expand on use case in section 2.2.1 (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/208 [WGLC Feedback]
- Consider information disclosure as a benefit (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/207 [WGLC Feedback]
- Relation of purpose to scope validated at API gateway (by obfuscoder)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/206
- purpose containing multiple space-delimited strings (by obfuscoder)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/205
4 issues received 4 new comments:
- #197 Clarify request_details (1 by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/197 [WGLC Feedback]
- #194 Reconsider 'purp' claim scope (1 by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/194 [WGLC Feedback]
- #193 Rationale for 'txn' being REQUIRED (1 by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/193 [WGLC Feedback]
- #189 Allow Gateways to issue Tx-token to self without using RFC8693 (1 by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/189 [WGLC Feedback]
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+1/-1/💬13)
1 issues created:
- Remove Type Metadata Glue Documents (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/334
5 issues received 13 new comments:
- #334 Remove Type Metadata Glue Documents (5 by adeinega, awoie, babisRoutis,
bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/334
- #333 mandate JWT when ietf status list is used (there is also cwt) (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/333 [HAS PR]
- #331 Type Metadata documents in the unprotected header of the JWS (4 by adeinega, babisRoutis, bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/331
- #320 Glue document to the protected header? (2 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/320
- #315 Recommend against using the x5u parameter in JWK (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/315 [Ready-for-PR]
1 issues closed:
- Glue document to the protected header? https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/320
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- Feedback from mailing list (by c2bo)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/issues/140
Pull requests
-------------
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+1/-0/💬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Proposed change to definition of authorization context (by PieterKas)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/pull/237
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+2/-0/💬8)
2 pull requests submitted:
- fix: add privacy concerns for cnf handling (by cre8)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/340
- Status List Token has to be a JWT (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/339
2 pull requests received 8 new comments:
- #340 fix: add privacy concerns for cnf handling (3 by bc-pi, cre8)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/340
- #336 Set vct:integrity to the list of attribute to not selectively disclosed (5 by babisRoutis, bc-pi, cre8)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/336
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-cross-device-security
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth
--
To have a summary like this sent to your list, see:
https://github.com/ietf-github-services/activity-summary
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
