Hi Rifaat, Hannes, and Deb, Thanks for sharing the updated charter. I have a few concrete points regarding boundaries and future scope that might be worth clarifying before the IESG telechat:
1. Coordination with the SPICE WG: Given that the newly formed SPICE WG is also tackling selective disclosure and digital credentials (SD-CWT), it would be helpful if the OAuth charter explicitly defined the coordination mechanisms. We should ensure there's no overlapping work, especially around Metadata and Capability Discovery. 2. Future of Identity Chaining: With `draft-ietf-oauth-identity-chaining` nearing completion, does the new charter keep the door open for further Workload Identity standardization and chaining extensions, or is this particular scope considered complete for now? 3. Alignment with W3C VCDM 2.0: Since our work on SD-JWT VC is heavily tied to ecosystems like the EU Digital Identity Wallet, should the charter explicitly mention ongoing alignment and maintenance regarding the W3C VCDM 2.0 specifications? Looking forward to the discussion. Best regards, Elazar. בתאריך יום ה׳, 7 במאי 2026 ב-19:27 מאת Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < [email protected]>: > All, > > The OAuth WG chairs and the Security AD (Deb) have been collaborating on a > proposal to recharter the OAuth WG. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-oauth/ > > Deb put this on the agenda of the IESG telechat for *My 21st*. > > Please, take a look and let us know if you have any comments. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
