Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for charter-ietf-oauth-05-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-oauth/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi all, Thank you for preparing this updated version of the charter. Please find below some few comments: # Agents CURRENT: As automated agents increasingly act on behalf of users, organizations, or both, these delegation patterns become increasingly involved and complex. ## Does the WG intend to work on identifying specifics of such schemes? ## Does the WG intend to publish applicability documents to show how existing OAuth Framework can be used in such contexts? ## The excerpt above exacerbates the need for having OAuth troubleshooting mechanisms and good error reporting. I suggest to add an item for operations/deployment considerations (and troubleshooting, in particular) under work program. # Restriction? CURRENT: The working group is now tackling these topics which will be published as Standards Track or BCPs: This statement would exclude that the WG can refresh work such as https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/inline-errata/rfc6819.html (that would, for example, integrate existing errata or considerations that may be specific to the complex delegation patterns listed above). I would argue for some flexibility here. Cheers, Med _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
