The chairs are aware of this and have been closely working with the EUDI
Wallet EC team, including regular meetings, to make sure we understand
their needs, help make progress on these, and give them an update on our
progress.
Having said that, adding some text along the lines of the suggested text
does not hurt.

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:32 AM Pierce Gorman <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Would it be helpful to include that the EUDI Wallet is required by the
> European Commission eIDAS 2.0 law for use by consumers and public sector
> entities (as well as businesses who voluntarily choose to use a “business”
> DI wallet)?
>
>
>
> Pierce
>
>
>
> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 21, 2026 10:24 AM
> *To:* Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Re: Charles Eckel's No Objection on
> charter-ietf-oauth-05-04: (with COMMENT)
>
>
>
> CAUTION: This email has originated outside of Numeracle. Please do not
> click on any links or open any attachments unless you can confirm the
> sender and you know the content is safe.
> ------------------------------
>
> Yes, that is what we meant.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>  Rifaat
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:18 AM Charles Eckel (eckelcu) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Deb,
>
>
>
> If my assumption that this was meant to be EU Digital Identity Wallet is
> correct, updating the name alone works for me.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> On May 21, 2026, at 6:53 AM, Deb Cooley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm happy to change the name to be correct.  I'm not sure a link is
> warranted.
>
>
>
> Deb
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 5:38 PM Charles Eckel via Datatracker <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Charles Eckel has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-oauth-05-04: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-oauth/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Nice charter. I agree with Eric that it is great to see the statement on
> the
> much-needed "extensions for authorization of automated agents working on
> behalf
> of users."
>
> I think it would be useful to clarify what is meant by "EU Wallet
> Initiative".
> Is this the EU Digital Identity Wallet? As this is an effort outside of the
> IETF, consider adding a link, e.g.,
>
> https://ec.europa.eu/digital-building-blocks/sites/spaces/EUDIGITALIDENTITYWALLET/pages/694487738/EU+Digital+Identity+Wallet+Home
> ,
> in order to avoid any confusion.
>
>
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: This message is confidential, for the exclusive use of the
> intended recipient and may contain privileged information. If you are not
> the intended recipient, any use of this message is strictly prohibited.
> E-mails may be intercepted, altered or read by unauthorized persons. In
> case you have received this message in error, please delete it from your
> system and notify the sender immediately by e-mail. If you contact a
> Numeracle e-mail address, we take this as your authorization to correspond
> with you by e-mail. Thank you!
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to