Hi Yaron!

Sorry for not getting back to this thread earlier, I was busy on other ends.
I'm happy you considered my feedback and that you found it useful. I
honestly think, the proposed protocol is much cleaner with the error
response now! Well done :) I like the authorization_details in the body,
because it makes integration so much easier if the client can just copy
whatever the resource server returns.

There's one thing I don't really understand yet. Why would a client change
the authorization server and attempt to get a new access token from a
different authorization server than the one it got its insufficient access
token from?
I expect the client to retry with the same authorization server and that
would mean that you don't need the authorization_details_types_required in
the error response. I guess, I'm missing something. Can you clarify with a
use case?

Best regards,
Judith

On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:07 AM Yaron ZEHAVI <yaron.zehavi=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear OAuth Working Group,
>
> I would like to reach out once more to request additional review and
> feedback for this draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zehavi-oauth-rar-metadata/
>
> The document addresses a practical interoperability challenge around Rich
> Authorization Requests (RAR): discovery of metadata for authorization
> details types, allowing clients dynamic discovery rather than relying on
> out-of-band agreements. It also standardizes error signaling in case
> insufficient RAR was provided and offers structured ways of remediation.
>
>
>
> *Draft -04 addresses feedback kindly provided by @Judith Kahrer
> <[email protected]> about clearer processing rules
> and resource server providing required RAR types alongside a
> WWW-Authenticate error caused by insufficient rar.*
>
> The draft was presented at IETF 125 and OSW 2026, where it received
> positive feedback, and is already seeing interest and adoption across
> real-world deployments, including:
>
> •           Norway's HelseID healthcare identity platform
>
> •           Raiffeisen Bank Romania
>
> •           The Model Context Protocol (MCP) Fine-Grained Authorization
> Working Group (see SEP-2643)
>
> This demonstrates the need for a standardized mechanism for RAR capability
> metadata discovery.
>
> We would greatly appreciate additional feedback.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Yaron Zehavi
> This message and any attachment ("the Message") are confidential. If you
> have received the Message in error, please notify the sender immediately
> and delete the Message from your system, any use of the Message is
> forbidden. Correspondence via e-mail is primarily for information purposes.
> RBI neither makes nor accepts legally binding statements via e-mail unless
> explicitly agreed otherwise. Information pursuant to § 14 Austrian
> Companies Code: Raiffeisen Bank International AG; Registered Office: Am
> Stadtpark 9, 1030 Vienna, Austria; Company Register Number: FN 122119m at
> the Commercial Court of Vienna (Handelsgericht Wien).
>
> Classification: GENERAL
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to