Dears, Thank you for considering the risks these flows present, as part of your "Updates to OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice" draft<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-update-03.html#name-shared-consent-in-brokered->.
I have special interest in this topic since we operate a platform offering brokered redirect-based OAuth. In our case we solved it with internal contracts, providing an app_id inside login_hint, telling the upstream AS who the downstream client is. However, our solution does not offer internet-scale interoperability. But the proposed solutions in the draft fall also short in my view: * Registering downstream clients at upstream authorization servers defeats the purpose of brokered OAuth flows. * Presenting users with consent screens from brokers adds friction and does not empower upstream AS to take informed decisions. I believe an improved pattern could be an OAuth Authorization Request Delegation Chain: A request-time RAR object that conveys clear information about downstream clients and brokers, in a verifiable and tamper-resistant way: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zehavi-oauth-authz-req-del-chain/ The proposed solution doesn't include any new endpoints, AS metadata, grant types, error codes, token formats etc. Only an informative recommended RAR type with prescribed creation and validation processing rules. I'm aware of parallel work on the topic of actor delegation, relevant among others in AI and OBO use-case. As my proposal is aimed at request time, I believe it complements actor delegation work and does not compete with it. I welcome WG feedback on the proposal, especially: * Can it help solve the identified security issue? * Are further alignment and layering required with regards to actor delegation prior art? Regards, Yaron ZEHAVI This message and any attachment ("the Message") are confidential. If you have received the Message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the Message from your system, any use of the Message is forbidden. Correspondence via e-mail is primarily for information purposes. RBI neither makes nor accepts legally binding statements via e-mail unless explicitly agreed otherwise. Information pursuant to ยง 14 Austrian Companies Code: Raiffeisen Bank International AG; Registered Office: Am Stadtpark 9, 1030 Vienna, Austria; Company Register Number: FN 122119m at the Commercial Court of Vienna (Handelsgericht Wien). Classification: GENERAL
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
