[OAUTH-WG] Re: Call for adoption - OAuth Proof of Possession Tokens with HTTP Message Signatures

[Dick Hardt]

Then perhaps this draft should be presented as DPoP 2.0 — ie a replacement
for current DPoP?

OAuth 2.0 solved the same use cases (and more) of OAuth 1.0 and we did not
pretend it was complimentary

On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 8:42 PM Paul Bastian <paul.bast...@posteo.de> wrote:

> Hi Warren,
>
> Here is the slide deck from OSW:
>
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1M54dFlaJP0UXeuIpYS3iPDDW3ulmySYP4yStO14SrbE/edit?usp=drivesdk
>
> We asked people at the end of the presentation which direction to go.
> Nobody supported extending DPoP. 5 people supported the direction of this
> draft.
>
> Best regards,
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
>

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org