All, Based on the feedback on the list, we do not think that there is enough support for this document at this point.
Regards, Rifaat & Hannes On Sun, Oct 4, 2026 at 9:46 AM Brian Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > I oppose adoption of this draft. > > Neil (and others but Neil in particular) has articulated a number of > concerns better than I could. But in general, introducing an additional > WG-sanctioned mechanism will create uncertainty and harm interoperability > without sufficient justification for doing so. > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 1:17 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is an official call for adoption for the *OAuth Proof of Possession >> Tokens with HTTP Message Signatures *draft: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-richer-oauth-httpsig-03.html >> >> Please, reply on the mailing list, on whether you support or oppose the >> adoption of this draft as a WG document by *October 5th*. >> >> Regards, >> Rifaat & Hannes >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> > > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and > privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any > review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from > your computer. Thank you.*
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
