Dr "Doom" Roubini sudah menyatakan bahwa recovery akan long dan painfull. Hari 
ini Prof Stiglitz (Nobel Price Winner) juga menguatkan thesis akan W recovery. 

Yang pasti teman2 di beberapa multi-national company setuju bahwa sampai 2012 
akan terjadi excessive supply dan perlu waktu supaya market bisa menyerap 
sampai terjadi titik equilibrium supply & demand (new world). 

Kebanyakan perusahaan multi national saat ini lagi freezing dengan gradually 
mengurangi karyawan supaya "endure", jangan sampai collapse untuk bisa melewati 
the worst stage dari krisis ini. 

---------
 Sept. 4 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy faces a “significant chance” of 
contracting again after emerging from its worst recession since the 1930s, 
Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz said. 
 
 “It’s not clear that the U.S. is recovering in a sustainable way,” Stiglitz, a 
Columbia University professor, told reporters yesterday in New York. 
 
 Economists and policy makers are expressing concern about the strength of a 
projected economic recovery, with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner saying 
two days ago that it’s too soon to remove government measures aimed at boosting 
growth. 
 
 Stiglitz said he sees two scenarios for the world’s largest economy in coming 
months. One is a period of “malaise,” in which consumption lags and private 
investment is slow to accelerate. The other is a rebound fueled by government 
stimulus that’s followed by an abrupt downturn -- an occurrence that economists 
call a “W-shaped’ recovery. 
 
 “There’s a significant chance of a W, but I don’t think it’s inevitable,” he 
said. The economy “could just bounce along the bottom.” 
 
 Stiglitz said it’s difficult to predict the economy’s trajectory because “we 
really are in a different world.” He said the crisis of the past year was made 
worse by lax regulation that allowed some financial firms to grow so large that 
the system couldn’t handle a failure of any of them. 
 
 Big Banks 
 
 “These institutions are not only too big to fail, they are too big to be 
managed,” he said. 
 
 Finance ministers and central bankers from the Group of 20 nations meet in 
London Sept. 4-5 to lay the groundwork for a summit in Pittsburgh later this 
month, where leaders will consider measures to overhaul supervision of the 
financial system. 
 
 The U.S. Treasury Department, in a statement yesterday, said it wants a global 
agreement requiring banks to increase their capital cushions to be reached by 
the end of next year. 
 
 Stiglitz, 66, said that while $787 billion in federal government stimulus is 
propelling growth this quarter, there’s no guarantee the economy will maintain 
its momentum. On whether the U.S. needs another injection of stimulus, Stiglitz 
said it’s best to “wait and see.” 
 
 “We did have a very big stimulus, and that stimulus has added to economic 
growth and will be adding in the current quarter,” he said. “But the question 
going forward in 2011 is the stimulus is coming off, and that’s a negative.” 
 
 Lehman’s Collapse 
 
 A U.S. government bailout of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which filed for 
bankruptcy a year ago, wouldn’t have prevented the global economy from sliding 
into a recession, Stiglitz said. 
 
 “Whether Lehman Brothers had or had not been bailed out, the global economy 
was headed for difficulties, a fact that seems increasingly evident as the 
world sputters in its recovery,” he said. 
 
 U.S. GDP shrank at a 1 percent annual rate from April to June, following a 6.4 
percent pace of contraction in the first three months of the year. 
 
 The drop was the fourth in a row, the longest contraction since quarterly 
records began in 1947. The world’s largest economy has shrunk 3.9 percent since 
last year’s second quarter, making this the deepest recession since the Great 
Depression. 
 
 Stiglitz won the Nobel Prize in economics in 2001 for showing that markets are 
inefficient when all parties in a transaction don’t have equal access to 
critical information, which is most of the time. 
 
 Unused Capacity 
 
 With so much excess capacity, the American economy faces a short-term threat 
of disinflation and possibly deflation, Stiglitz said. Wages may even decline, 
given recent high productivity and the likelihood of an extended period of high 
unemployment, he said. 
 
 Longer term, he said the Fed’s aggressive monetary policy will mean inflation 
becomes the greater threat. “With the magnitude of the deficits and the balance 
sheet of the Fed having been blown up, it’s understandable why there are 
anxieties about inflation,” he said. 
 
 While the Fed says it has the tools to deal with it, there are still concerns, 
Stiglitz said. Because monetary policy takes six to 18 months to have its full 
effect, the central bank will have to begin withdrawing monetary stimulus on 
the basis of forecasts. 
 
 The Fed’s record on its economic forecasts isn’t enough to reassure investors 
and, as a result, the U.S. currency may suffer, he said. 
 
 Dollar ‘Weakness’ 
 
 “Whether or not they’re able to do it, the uncertainty today about whether 
they can do it can contribute to the weakness of the dollar,” Stiglitz said. 
“That’s one of the reasons there is increasing interest around the world in 
discussing alternatives to the dollar system.” 
 
 Stiglitz, who is a member of a United Nations commission that will study the 
global financial system and currency regimes, said “the logic is compelling” 
for a new global currency. 
 
 The current system creates instability, weakens global confidence, and is 
fundamentally unfair to developing countries that are in essence lending the 
U.S. trillions of dollars and bearing the risk, he said. 
 
 “In most quarters, there is a feeling we should move away from the dollar 
system. The question is do we do it in an orderly way, or a chaotic way,” 
Stiglitz said. “The size of the deficit and the size of the balance sheet of 
the Fed have just increased the anxiety and the desire that something be done.” 
 
 While some think it would hurt the U.S. to no longer be able to borrow cheaply 
in dollars, “that era is over,” he said. “We’re moving to a more multi-polar 
world.” 
 
 Between the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of Lehman Brothers was 
“the short period of American triumphalism, where we dominated the global 
scene. That period is over,” Stiglitz said. 
 
 To contact the reporter on this story: Michael McKee in New York at 
mmc...@bloomberg.net ; 


------------------------------------

+ +
+ + + + +
Mohon saat meREPLY posting, text dari posting lama dihapus 
kecuali diperlukan agar CONTEXTnya jelas.
+ + + + +
+ +Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/obrolan-bandar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/obrolan-bandar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:obrolan-bandar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:obrolan-bandar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    obrolan-bandar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke