2450 - 2475 ada gap.
Yg di Rp 8.000 ada gap jg, apa harus ditutup?
kapan yah![]()
--- Pada Kam, 1/10/09, elvira raven <elvirara...@yahoo.com> menulis:
Dari: elvira raven <elvirara...@yahoo.com>
Judul: Re: [ob] To Proft JT: Will it be possible BUMI in range 2,550-2,750 technically?
Kepada: obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com
Tanggal: Kamis, 1 Oktober, 2009, 4:00 PM
gap itu hutang yg harus di bayar...percaya ga percaya.. pasti ketutup.. --- On Thu, 10/1/09, Cougar Boy <boysngi...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Cougar Boy <boysngi...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ob] To Proft JT: Will it be possible BUMI in range 2,550-2,750 technically?
To: obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 3:30 PM
kalau gap itu ditutup..
say farewell buat BUMI medium term.
Gap itu bukan sembarang gap...haram ditutup 2009/10/2 elvira raven <elviraraven@ yahoo.com>
| bukannya enak turunnya makin dalam.. dapat lotnya lebih banyak..
ingat2,, masih ada gap di 2450 kalo ga salah :D 2450.. im in --- On Thu, 10/1/09, kokol...@yahoo. co.id <kokol...@yahoo. co.id> wrote:
From: kokol...@yahoo. co.id <kokol...@yahoo. co.id>
Subject: Re: [ob] To Proft JT: Will it be possible BUMI in range 2,550-2,750 technically?
Date: Thursday, October 1, 2009, 2:47 PM
Ikut ambil antrian di situ pak...level 3000 pun sudah berani ngumpulin apalagi kalo bisa dapat lebih murah..tp bisa ga ya dengan adanya sentimen pemilihan ketua partai kuning itu? Sent from my BlackBerry® powered by Bakrie Group
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 04:35:58 +0700 To: <obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com> Subject: [ob] To Proft JT: Will it be possible BUMI in range 2,550-2,750
technically?
Kalau seandainya nanti BUMI break support, secara technical bisa turun sampai berapa prof? Berapa saja level support selanjutnya?
If say I would buy on range 2,550-2,750, will it be possible? =)
Many thanks prof JT...
T.o.m
On 10/1/09, JsxTrader <jsxtra...@yahoo. com> wrote:
Freq tinggi tapi Volume kecil.., kayaknya ngusirin penumpang aje kali.., nungguin retailer pada kabur…. So far ngga ada DOWN pressure, I see strength in the ‘background’
JT
|
|
|
