Berikut ini beberapa cuplikan yang diambil dari tulisan Wimar Witoelar:(re-post)


Many parliamentarians who now allege fraud in the Bank Century bailout agreed 
with the bailout decision at the time it was taken. Finance Minister Sri 
Mulyani and Vice President Boediono should be the last people in any Indonesian 
government to be accused of dishonesty, with clean records for the lifespan of 
their careers. So why are these good people being vilified by politicians, 
student activists and people on the street?

 
The political battle could become serious if a TV expose gathers momentum, if a 
station presents a clinical overview of the tax fraud cases pending against the 
Bakrie Group. To make a long story short, it involves an amount that may well 
reach Rp 10 trillion (US$1.09 billion) in tax and royalty debts and fines for 
tax evasion. The Bakrie Group has declined to comment so we do not know their 
side of the story. But if the allegations are true then the money is much 
greater than the alleged Bank Century bailout cost, which is clearly 
retrievable. So where are the criminals? In the Century case, in the Bakrie 
case, in both, or in none of the above? As the chorus lament in Sophocles' 
Antigone: "Who is the slayer, who the victim? Speak".

The public wants to know. Not because we want to choose one above the other, 
not for the sake of picking the winner. The public has no partisan agenda 
because it's not only about winning; it's about doing the right thing.





________________________________
From: victor_sperandeo <victor_sperandeo@ yahoo.com>
To: obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Sun, January 17, 2010 11:57:39 AM
Subject: [ob] Insight: The Century and Bumi cases: Who is the slayer, who is 
the victim?

  
Insight: The Century and Bumi cases: Who is the slayer, who is the victim?

Wimar Witoelar , Jakarta | Wed, 01/13/2010 9:05 AM | Headlines

After the disastrous machine gun attack on the Togolese national football 
team's bus on the Angola border, Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger said the African 
Cup of Nations should continue despite the fact the attack killed several 
people. "I don't believe you can just stop a competition because of an incident 
as I think that would reward the people who provoked the incident and could 
mean that any competition is stopped at any time," added Wenger, who has 
Arsenal players Alex Song (Cameroon) and Emmanuel Eboue (Ivory Coast) playing 
for their national teams in the finals. Arsenal Wenger has got it right. It's 
not only about winning. It's about doing the right thing.

There is more than a touch of surrealism in the events unfolding today. We 
remember that President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (SBY) won his second term with 
a majority of more than 60 percent. In addition, he has done nothing wrong. 
Even if he was at fault in the Bank Century allegations, it happened in 2008, 
the year before the political parties initiated the parliamentary proceedings 
supported by the media group that is owned by tax evaders.

Many parliamentarians who now allege fraud in the Bank Century bailout agreed 
with the bailout decision at the time it was taken. Finance Minister Sri 
Mulyani and Vice President Boediono should be the last people in any Indonesian 
government to be accused of dishonesty, with clean records for the lifespan of 
their careers. So why are these good people being vilified by politicians, 
student activists and people on the street?

You need search no further back than 2001 for a possible answer. The night 
before last New Year's Eve, the nation lost a great man who held the presidency 
for less than two years until he was ousted in 2001. In those brief years, 
Abdurrahman "Gus Dur" Wahid succeeded in launching the greatest reforms in 
Indonesia's civil society. Through his leadership and the support of many good 
people, Indonesia became an overnight leader in the promotion of pluralism, 
democracy and humanity. Gus Dur is by all measures a hero. 

Although he lost the presidency, Gus Dur was elevated to become the keeper of 
the nation's conscience. He was a victim of a cabal, a small group of secret 
plotters. Who were the plotters? Parliament leaders, the media, big money, 
misguided students and paid activists. There is a strong sense of déjà vu. The 
cast of characters in 2010 is a bit different from 2001 but the story is the 
same.

SBY is not Gus Dur, but they are both popular leaders facing vindictive 
politicians. Substitute Golkar chairman Aburizal Bakrie for Amien Rais in the 
leading role and you have the same scenario now as we had back then. 
Bulog-Bruneigate was the excuse for wanton attacks on the president in 2001 and 
Bank Century is the issue in 2010. Buloggate was never proven as a crime and 
neither will the Bank Century case. Amien Rais went for straight impeachment 
instead, explaining that it didn't matter what he was guilty of, he had been 
removed. Aburizal may yet desert Century and aim at impeachment, all or nothing.

According to the press, student groups and activists plan to hold rallies to 
pressure President Yudhoyono and Vice President Boediono to step down. They 
demand that SBY and Boediono resign because the students feel they can no 
longer expect anything from them. Many do not agree, but they do not have the 
funding to resist, nor do they own political parties and television stations. 
The economy needs the smart and impeccably clean finance minister, but she is 
drowned out by meaningless screams.

Where are the anti-Wahid activists of 2001 now? Everybody mourns the passing of 
Gus Dur whom the demonstrators derided, insulted and forced out of office. 
Students joined demonstrations led by Amien Rais in March of 2001. Where have 
they all gone? Will the activists of 2010 also disappear once their cynical job 
is done? Activists announced they would take to the streets in a force of 
100,000 people last month on International Anti-Corruption Day. Fears 
disappeared when only 5,000 demonstrators showed up in Jakarta. A group of 50 
threw stones at a KFC outlet in Makassar believing the neoliberal corporation 
was involved in Bank Century. Why such a disappointing turnout? It was raining, 
the leaders later explained.

The political battle could become serious if a TV expose gathers momentum, if a 
station presents a clinical overview of the tax fraud cases pending against the 
Bakrie Group. To make a long story short, it involves an amount that may well 
reach Rp 10 trillion (US$1.09 billion) in tax and royalty debts and fines for 
tax evasion. The Bakrie Group has declined to comment so we do not know their 
side of the story. But if the allegations are true then the money is much 
greater than the alleged Bank Century bailout cost, which is clearly 
retrievable. So where are the criminals? In the Century case, in the Bakrie 
case, in both, or in none of the above? As the chorus lament in Sophocles' 
Antigone: "Who is the slayer, who the victim? Speak".

The public wants to know. Not because we want to choose one above the other, 
not for the sake of picking the winner. The public has no partisan agenda 
because it's not only about winning; it's about doing the right thing.

http://www.thejakar tapost.com/ news/2010/ 01/13/insight- the-century- 
and-bumi- cases-who- slayer-who- victim.html






      

Kirim email ke