Ini pak newsnya
jadi bukan mau nampungin barang
Saya sama sekali ngak hold posisi di BUMI even dia market mover
Subject: FW: (BN) Tata Power Falls After Profit Drops on Coal Expenses
>
> folks, bumi related expenses reflected in tata's earnings.
>
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---+
>
> Tata Power Falls After Profit Drops on Coal Expenses (Update1)
> 2010-02-26 06:12:53.318 GMT
>
>
> (Adds analyst's comment in fourth paragraph.)
>
> By Gaurav Singh and Natalie Obiko Pearson
> Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Tata Power Co., India's largest non-
> state electricity generator, declined the most in seven months
> in Mumbai trading after reporting an 82 percent slump in profit
> from writing off expenses at coal mines in Indonesia.
> The stock fell as much as 5.7 percent to 1,197 rupees, the
> biggest drop since July 6, and was at 1,217.95 rupees at 11:28
> a.m. local time. The Mumbai-based utility's shares have gained
> 66 percent in a year, lagging behind the 82 percent advance in
> the benchmark Sensitive Index.
> Net income, including that of units, fell to 925.7 million
> rupees in the quarter ended Dec. 31 from 5 billion rupees a year
> earlier, Tata Power said yesterday. The company took a 3.7
> billion rupee ($80 million) charge related to deferred coal
> extraction expenses, and said production cost would rise by
> $1.42 a metric ton, an increase of about 5 percent.
> "That is big," said Abhineet Anand, a Mumbai-based
> analyst with Antique Stock Broking Ltd. "In terms of valuation,
> if the overall cost of production is somewhere between $36 to
> $38 per ton, then you increase that by another $1.50, that
> directly hits your profit after tax."
> The Tata Power group includes the company's mining assets
> in Indonesia and local distribution and trading units. Tata
> Power holds 30 percent stakes in two Indonesian coal mines owned
> by PT Bumi Resources.
>
> For Related News and Information:
> Tata Power news: TPWR IN <Equity> CN <GO>
> Top India stories: TOP IN <GO>
> Top energy stories: ETOP <GO>
>
> --Editors: Amit Prakash, Alex Devine.
>
> To contact the reporter on this story:
> Gaurav Singh in New Delhi at +91-11-4179-2019 or
> gsing...@bloomberg.net
> Natalie Obiko Pearson in Mumbai at +91-22-6612-9107 or
> npears...@bloomberg.net.
>
>
> To contact the editor responsible for this story:
> Clyde Russell at +65-6311-2423 or crusse...@bloomberg.net.
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: ANDIK MUSTIKA
To: obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: [ob] FW: BUMI potential bad news - Untuk Penggemar BUMI
sekarang kayaknya banyak yang strees bin frustasi pak...jadi dibawah
2000 itu mungkin...
hofully...
wkwkwkwkwk..gue stress juga kali ya..
--- On Sun, 2/28/10, Djokro Wijaja <stocksuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Djokro Wijaja <stocksuc...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ob] FW: BUMI potential bad news - Untuk Penggemar BUMI
To: obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 8:00 PM
Perjalanan msh jauh, ini saja ane baru pake 10% heheheh ... kalo GAK
MURAH GAK BELI :D
Di bawah 2000 mah nunggu orang stress bin frustasi jual dulu
heheeheh,... .
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:50 AM, ANDIK MUSTIKA <ahmust...@yahoo. com>
wrote:
ane tunggu di bawah 2000 saja pak...
--- On Sun, 2/28/10, Djokro Wijaja <stocksucker@ gmail.com>
wrote:
From: Djokro Wijaja <stocksucker@ gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ob] FW: BUMI potential bad news - Untuk
Penggemar BUMI
To: obrolan-bandar@ yahoogroups. com
Date: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 7:42 PM
Good ! , mustinya 2050 dapet, di bawah itu pun GAK NOLAK
.... mumpung duit msh fresh di rekening nih, gatel tangan pencet BUY terus
heheheeh .....
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Herman <power8...@gmx.
net> wrote:
News untuk BUMI
- BUMI: some potential negative news out. India's TATA
reported earnings that were down 82%YoY due to a USD 76m deferred strippin
charge in their 30% owned coal subs (KPC+Artutmin) . As BUMI owns the other
70%, BUMI could show as much as USD 250m in the same charges for FY09. This
would obviously substantially lower earnings (and tax liability, which might be
the main reason), and would come as a negative surprise.
