Kalau dulu sih...katanya "FED job is to save the economy not the stock market"
itu bulan Agustus 2007 Tapi kalau diperhatikan dari apa yang sudah dilakukan FED dengan rate cut gila-gilaan setiap ada market crash. Terlihat dengan jelas "What FED did is saving the Stock Market, and who care about the economy" anyway. FED dibuat oleh kaum kuat. Bagaimanapun juga harus tetap memihak yang kuat. "Membela yang kuat, menghajar yang lemah, tidak peduli mana yang benar" I love this game Halim On Jan 30, 2008 7:13 AM, alfanendya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fed May Cut Rate to Below Inflation, Risking New Asset Bubbles > By Craig Torres and Simon Kennedy > > Jan. 29 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve may push interest rates > below the pace of inflation this year to avert the first simultaneous > decline in U.S. household wealth and income since 1974. > > The threat of cascading stock and home values and a weakening labor > market will spur the Fed to cut its benchmark rate by half a > percentage point tomorrow, traders and economists forecast. That would > bring the rate to 3 percent, approaching one measure of price > increases monitored by the Fed. > > ``The Fed is going to have to keep slashing rates, probably below > inflation,'' said Robert Shiller, the Yale University economist who > co-founded an index of house prices. ``We are starting to see a change > in consumer psychology.'' > > So-called negative real interest rates represent an emergency strategy > by Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and are fraught with risks. The central > bank would be skewing incentives toward spending, away from saving, > typically leading to asset booms and busts that have to be dealt with > later. > > Negative real rates are ``a substantial danger zone to be in,'' said > Marvin Goodfriend, a former senior policy adviser at the Richmond Fed > bank. ``The Fed's mistakes have been erring too much on the side of > ease, creating circumstances where you had either excessive inflation, > or a situation where there is an excessive boom that goes on too long.'' > > Adjusting Outlook > > The Federal Open Market Committee begins its two-day meeting today and > will announce its decision at about 2:15 p.m. in Washington tomorrow. > Officials will also discuss updates to their three-year economic > forecasts at the session. > > Bernanke, 54, and his colleagues on Jan. 22 lowered the target rate > for overnight loans between banks by three-quarters of a percentage > point. The cut was the biggest since the Fed began using the rate as > its main policy tool in 1990 and followed a slide in stocks from Hong > Kong to London that threatened to send U.S. equities down by more than > 5 percent. > > The central bank will probably lower the rate to at least 2.25 percent > in the first half, according to futures prices quoted on the Chicago > Board of Trade. The chance of a half-point cut tomorrow is 88 percent, > with 12 percent odds on a quarter- point. > > Inflation, as measured by the personal consumption expenditures price > index minus food and energy, was a 2.5 percent annual rate in the > fourth quarter, economists estimate. The Commerce Department releases > the figures tomorrow. > > Mortgage Binge > > The last time the Fed pushed real rates so low was in 2005, in the > middle of the three-year housing bubble, when consumers took on $2.9 > trillion in new home-loan debt, the biggest increase of any three-year > period on record. > > Aggressive rate cuts are justified if there's ``conclusive evidence'' > that household income prospects are in danger, said Goodfriend, now a > professor at the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon > University in Pittsburgh. > > They might be. Real disposable income grew at a 2.1 percent annual > pace in November, the slowest in 16 months, as higher food and energy > costs eroded paychecks. Home prices in 20 U.S. metropolitan areas fell > 6.1 percent in October from a year earlier, the most in at least six > years. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is down 15 percent from its > record on Oct. 11. > > The last time household real estate, stocks and real incomes all > declined in a quarter was during the 1974 recession, according to > calculations by Macroeconomic Advisers LLC. > > `Losing That Prop' > > ``Wealth had been rising because of strong home prices'' and stock > gains, said Chris Varvares, president of Macroeconomic Advisers in St. > Louis. ``Now, we are losing that prop to consumption, so it all comes > down to growth in real income.'' > > Varvares predicted that housing and investment portfolios will add > nothing to consumption this year, while incomes, after inflation, may > gradually rise ``so long as oil behaves.'' The firm expects the > economy to grow at a 1 percent to 2 percent annual pace in the first half. > > ``A big part of the 75 basis point surprise was to blunt the worsening > of financial conditions'' that may reduce employment and hurt income > growth, Varvares said. The firm predicts a half-point cut tomorrow. > > ``That need not be the end,'' Harvard University economist Martin > Feldstein, said in an interview. ``They can keep coming back and > revisiting it every six weeks.'' > > Feldstein, a member of the group that dates U.S. economic cycles, said > any recession this year ``could be much more painful because of the > fragility of the financial sector.'' > > The Fed incorporates wealth effects, or the impact of changes in > household assets on spending, in its economic model. Americans cut > spending by about 5 cents for every $1 of decline in their home values > or stock portfolios, economists estimate. > > ``We are likely to see another wave of problems in the consumer-credit > side,'' John Thain, chief executive officer of Merrill Lynch & Co., > said at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last week. > ``This is going to be exacerbated by the rise in unemployment and we > have issues with higher energy prices.'' > > > > > + + > + + + + + > Mohon saat meREPLY posting, text dari posting lama dihapus > kecuali diperlukan agar CONTEXTnya jelas. > + + + + + > + + > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
