maybe have an option for compiling it in then?
-F
-----Original Message-----
From: Mayhem & Chaos Coordinator [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 1999 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Plans for the next release
> Not sure how hard this would be (never tried it) but couldn't we set up an
> admin page and password protect it?
> Also, as a thought, it might be easier to keep the file code out of the
> daemon and just use perl. This way the actual amount of memory used by the
> obs daemon would be less, and it would be alot easier for people to
> customize.
Let's just do both. Do you see any problems with that?
> I know perl is slower than c but I don't think that's really an issue in
> this case. Anyone out there make a good case for keeping the add/remove
file
> code in the daemon?
The add/remove code is in the daemon so that files could be checked in and
out of the system easily, via a remote interface. I *hate* NFS and I wanted
to have an alternate route for getting data into the system aside from files
mounted into the local filesystem.
--ruaok Freezerburn! All else is only icing. -- Soul Coughing
Robert Kaye -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://moon.eorbit.net/~robert
