[laugh] Roger Larsen reacted to your message: ________________________________ From: James Tandy via observium <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, 26 May 2026 17:36:57 To: Observium <[email protected]> Cc: Jim DeVico <[email protected]>; Adam Armstrong <[email protected]>; James Tandy <[email protected]> Subject: [Observium] Re: transceivers
Just makes me think of https://xkcd.com/927/ lol Sent from my Galaxy -------- Original message -------- From: Adam Armstrong via observium <[email protected]> Date: 26/05/2026 17:44 (GMT+00:00) To: Observium <[email protected]>, Jim DeVico via observium <[email protected]> Cc: Jim DeVico <[email protected]>, Adam Armstrong <[email protected]> Subject: [Observium] Re: transceivers It's complicated. It depends upon specific support being added for the platform usually, because no vendor has been able to decide on a standards-based way of doing anything new since 2001. Thanks, adam. Jim DeVico via observium wrote on 26/05/2026 16:53: What does observium consider a transceiver and how are they read? I do not see any info regarding any of my fiber SFPs. [cid:image.png] _______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -- Sent from Postbox<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________ observium mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
