> I think that the package should be either synced or removed from Lucid
Which do you think is the more appropriate option?
It currently has zero reverse dependencies, and its recent removal from
Debian might indicate that it's not very well maintained/too much in
flux. So would it be better to remove?
** Changed in: ocaml-batteries (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
[OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 5/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml
transition from Debian (sid) to lucid (universe)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530305
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
OCaml Maintainers, which is a direct subscriber.
Status in “frama-c” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ocaml-batteries” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete
Bug description:
Binary package hint: frama-c
Hello,
Reminder: there is an OCaml transitition going on in lucid. Its progress can be
monitored at:
http://bentobako.org/ubuntu-ocaml-status/transition_monitor/ocaml_transition_monitor.html
http://bentobako.org/ubuntu-ocaml-status/transition_monitor/ports_transition_monitor.html
Please sync the following package:
frama-c (20090901+beryllium+dfsg-2 -> 20090902+beryllium+dfsg-4)
Note:this is a new upstream (minor) release. Most changes are in packaging
(upstream as well as debian). Dependencies changed so that why now depends on
frama-c (and not the other way around, as it was previously). It has been built
successfully on all architectures in Debian, and is in testing. I hereby
request a feature freeze exception.
Thanks in advance,
--
Stéphane
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ocaml-maint
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ocaml-maint
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
