Hello Dustin, or anyone else affected, Accepted sks into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sks/1.1.1+dpkgv3-7ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please change the bug tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not, change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: sks (Ubuntu Precise) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian OCaml Maintainers, which is subscribed to sks in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1061769 Title: sks postinst uses dpkg-vendor, but doesn't depend on dpkg-dev (nor should it) Status in Precise Backports: New Status in “sks” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “sks” source package in Precise: Fix Committed Status in “sks” source package in Quantal: Fix Released Bug description: A recent change to sks packaging uses the dpkg-vendor command to determine if the current OS derives from Ubuntu. dpkg-vendor is provided by the dpkg-dev package, which sks does not, and should not depend on. In order for the postinst to behave properly, it needs to gracefully handle the situation where the dpkg-vendor command does not exist. ubuntu@ip-10-195-165-105:~$ sudo apt-get install sks --reinstall Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/802 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 25941 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace sks 1.1.1+dpkgv3-7ubuntu0.2 (using .../sks_1.1.1+dpkgv3-7ubuntu0.2_amd64.deb) ... Stopping sks daemons: sksrecon.. sksdb.. done. Unpacking replacement sks ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Setting up sks (1.1.1+dpkgv3-7ubuntu0.2) ... debian-sks uid check: ok debian-sks homedir check: ok /var/lib/dpkg/info/sks.postinst: 76: /var/lib/dpkg/info/sks.postinst: dpkg-vendor: not found Starting sks daemons: Not starting sks (as configured in /etc/default/sks) == SRU == === IMPACT === This bug impacts any 12.04 server running SKS where dpkg-dev is not installed (which is often the case), and upgrades to the current package in precise-updates. dpkg-dev would drag in a handful of development level utilities and compilers that many administrators would not want on their production server. === TEST CASE === Take a 12.04 server installed prior to July 9, 2012, with SKS installed. In my case, I started a 12.04 server in EC2, and commented out the two lines in /etc/apt/sources.list referencing precise-updates. Install SKS: $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y sks Then, uncomment the precise-updates lines in /etc/apt/sources.list, and upgrade SKS: $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y sks === REGRESSION POTENTIAL === As implemented, minimal. === MINIMAL PATCH === diff -Nru sks-1.1.3/debian/sks.postinst sks-1.1.3/debian/sks.postinst --- sks-1.1.3/debian/sks.postinst 2012-07-02 06:19:39.000000000 -0500 +++ sks-1.1.3/debian/sks.postinst 2012-10-04 12:46:25.000000000 -0500 @@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ if [ -r /var/lib/sks/berkeley_db.active ]; then OLD_BDB=$(cat /var/lib/sks/berkeley_db.active) else - if dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu; then + if (type dpkg-vendor >/dev/null && dpkg-vendor --derives-from Ubuntu) || \ + [ -e /etc/dpkg/origins/ubuntu ]; then if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1.1.1+dpkgv3-6.1"; then OLD_BDB=4.7 else To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/precise-backports/+bug/1061769/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ocaml-maint Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ocaml-maint More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
