On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 11:36:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > - hash = full_name_hash(name, len);
>
> err, you might want to calculate that hash outside the spinlock.
Hmm, good catch.
> Maybe have a lock per bucket, too.
That could be an avenue to explore. I guess we probably want to optimize the
actual lookup and memory usage before looking at that.
> A 1MB hashtable is verging on comical. How may data are there in total?
Yes 1MB is much too big. We're looking right now at 3 lock resources per
inode, so total number of elements depends upon your file system I suppose.
Hopefully I'll have some time today to run some basic tests which may show
us what size strikes a better balance of performance versus memory overhead.
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
