J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 10:26:09PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote: >>A poor distribution as you already noticed[1]. > > How did you decide that?
I looked at it and jumped to the wrong conclusion :-) When I actually simulated it I found that the distribution is in fact not much different from what I get from rand. So much for trying to pin the blame on the hash function. Next lets try to pin the blame on vmalloc. (Spoiler: it's not vmalloc's fault either.) Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
