On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:23:47PM -0700, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >>It is worth remembering that not every OCFS2 user will be running it on a
> >>big expensive SAN. Probably not even the majority.
> >
> >Well, that's debatable. My only point, though, is that there are higher
> >priority things that we should get to first because they affect *everyone*.
>
> By all means, prioritize them. Did separate journals make the list, even
> if well towards the end?
It's on the list now.
>
> >If the lack of external journals makes you sad, well, I'm sorry to hear
> >that. We certainly wouldn't turn away patches if someone got to it
> >before us.
>
> By proposing a feature that I do not also implicitly propose that Oracle
> employees have to do the work. This is a quick hack after all, I would be
> happy to contribute.
By all means. It should be a fairly straightfoward change. Out of
curiousity, are we talking about a single journal device (all slot journals
on one disk) or one device per journal?
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
