Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > On 2006-05-25T20:31:33, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Goals: >> - Lightweight, kernel based fencing harness >> - Support pluggable fencing methods >> - Pluggable methods take policy out of kernel >> - No reinvented wheels, use kernel modules >> - Also accomodate user space fencing methods >> - Divide work appropriately between kernel and user space >> - Obey memory deadlock prevention rules >> - Obey safe module unload rules >> - Handle multiple clusters per node > > Sorry we're chiming in so late, but with Jeff's user-space membership > patches, we have user-space driven fencing working with heartbeat 2.
Which patches? For OCFS2? If so, then what have you done to avoid memory deadlock? Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
