>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2007 at 4:33 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert, > > > Would Samba work with something like the > > cluster iptables load sharing stuff? > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux- ha/2007- May/025390.html > > (guess the point is to create a single system > > image file server cluster) > > Samba+ctdb has IP failover and load sharing builtin. It also has smart > stuff to handle startup/monitoring of any system service, so it will > do things like:
Thanks Tridge, sounds really interesting, just fwiw, and as a reminder, it's possible to build OCFS2 clusters using iSCSI and FireWire storage, incase anyone was concerned about the hardware requirements of building a (Samba) cluster... ;-) Couple of other things worth mentioning perhaps, regarding managability of open source clusters and storage solutions: Free commercial quality product doc for Heartbeat2: http://lists.community.tummy.com/pipermail/linux-ha/2007-June/025566.html Open source Linux Storage Resource Management software: http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aperi-dev/msg00485.html > - if the link status of the public network interface goes down, then > the public IP of that node gets moved to a different node within a > few seconds, and moved back when the link status is OK again Interested in how this works, I need to find time to read your Wiki... (e.g. binding IP addresses this could be supported by OCFS2 dlmfs, if not using Heartbeat2...:-) > - ctdb does all the gratuitous arp stuff, plus does TCP 'tickle' acks Nice :-) > on failover, ensuring absolutely minimum failover time without > relying on (slow!) tcp keepalives. We run tests with windows boxes > copying files, then pull the plug on the node that windows is > connected to. The xcopy hardly pauses at all as it continues with > another cluster node. > > Have a look at http://samba.org/~tridge/ctdb/config/ to see the > standard config stuff in ctdb. I'm afraid the ctdb wiki is down right > now, but when it comes back there is a lot more info there. > > For load sharing, we use round- robin DNS, and round- robin WINS. All > cluster nodes behave the same, so you have one name for all the > nodes. If you have the money, a load balancing switch is also a good > choice. > > We eventually want to do dynamic load balancing, where Samba migrates > live connections between nodes according to demand. At the moment we > only do load balancing at connect time, which is OK, but not ideal. Sounds really interesting/fun, thanks for the info, Robert _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
