On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:18:58PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> But I'm still not understanding what you mean by "1 kobject for
> the directory". We have one kobject for the "logmask" directory, and
> then attributes for each log type. I don't see how that would change.
Oh, wait, I'm an idiot. It does look like its a kset. If we
set the ktype to have the ops and attrs, just like we do, but use a
kobj, would that make you happier?
Joel
--
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always
so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts."
- Bertrand Russell
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
_______________________________________________
Ocfs2-devel mailing list
Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
