Mark Fasheh wrote: > A lot of the above seems a bit like overkill to me. Couldn't we just get > this stuff with 'mount' and 'debugfs.ocfs2'? >
We could. However, this info is useful because it could be captured automatically by oswatcher. > Also, I wonder if it's not a bad idea to split out the important stuff into > their own files. > That would be useful once we have more information to provide. Right now I like the symmetry between the dlm_state and fs_state... like the two locking state(s). > Same comment regarding generic_file_llseek() here. > Working on it. _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
