Mainline commit dabc47de7a23f57522dc762d9d2ad875700d3497 The code was using dlm->spinlock instead of dlm->ast_lock to protect the ast_list. This patch fixes the issue.
Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <[email protected]> Acked-by: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c index 86ca085..fcf879e 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmunlock.c @@ -117,11 +117,11 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmunlock_common(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, else BUG_ON(res->owner == dlm->node_num); - spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); + spin_lock(&dlm->ast_lock); /* We want to be sure that we're not freeing a lock * that still has AST's pending... */ in_use = !list_empty(&lock->ast_list); - spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock); + spin_unlock(&dlm->ast_lock); if (in_use) { mlog(ML_ERROR, "lockres %.*s: Someone is calling dlmunlock " "while waiting for an ast!", res->lockname.len, -- 1.5.6.3 _______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
