Signed-off-by: Sunil Mushran <[email protected]> Wengang Wang wrote: > when we check/modify lockres->purge, we should with the protection of > lockres->spinlock. > in dlm_purge_lockres(), the checking/modifying is not with the protectin. > this patch fixes it. > > Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]> > --- > fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 6 +++++- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > index d490b66..98569e8 100644 > --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c > @@ -212,14 +212,18 @@ static int dlm_purge_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, > spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock); > } > > + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); > if (!list_empty(&res->purge)) { > mlog(0, "removing lockres %.*s:%p from purgelist, " > "master = %d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, > res, master); > list_del_init(&res->purge); > + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); > dlm_lockres_put(res); > dlm->purge_count--; > - } > + } else > + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); > + > __dlm_unhash_lockres(res); > > /* lockres is not in the hash now. drop the flag and wake up >
_______________________________________________ Ocfs2-devel mailing list [email protected] http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel
